Following two letters reflecting true picture have been written by our GS to Secretary Post. It is hoped that our Directorate will take note of it in the larger interest of the cadre.
No. GS/AIAIASP/PS Gr. B/2012 dated 25th October, 2012
To,
Ms Manjula Prasher,
Director General, Department of Posts,
Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi 110 001.
Subject : Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the cadre of PS Gr. B for the year 2012. Regarding transparency in communication of marks.
Ref. : Postal Directorate memo No. A-34012/3/2012-DE dated 17th July, 2012.
Respected Madam,
It
is brought to your kind notice that result of above captioned examination was
declared by the Department vide No. A-34013/03/2012-DE dated 17th July, 2012
but no separate marks for paragraph writing were shown in the tabulation sheet
whereas it was mentioned earlier while declaring result of PS Gr. B Examination
2011 vide memo No. A-34012/01/2011-DE dated 23rd June 2011. Due to unclear
position, it is difficult to identify the weak areas and strong areas, thus,
there is great resentment amongst the aspirants on this account. It is also an
admitted fact that PS Group “B” recruitment process has always been in
controversy inviting litigations and repeated references by this associations.
But unfortunately department has chosen its ways and convenient means to
declare results without affording equal opportunities to members and without
waiting the outcomes of Hon’ble administrative Tribunal. Pick and chose policy
in the name of examination through this system cannot be ruled out as such this
association has reservations over the examination system.
This
Association would also like to further state that, answer keys published by
Department for certain questions do not have proper and correct answers. Apart
from it, a few questions were repeatedly put in the same question paper. The
irregularity is a matter of serious concern and necessarily required to look
into.
It
is therefore urged that necessary instructions may please be issued to DE
Division of the Directorate to publish separate marks obtained in paragraph
writing in Paper-I to maintain transparency in communication of marks. It is
further requested to take steps to delete the wrong questions from the question
papers and declare the result of above captioned examination accordingly to
avoid litigations if any arising in the context.
Hoping
for favourable action please.
Yours sincerely,
(Vilas Ingale)
These two letters depatched under Kalyan R.S.
Post Office speed post No. EM935337022IN dated 25/10/2012.
Letter-II
No. GS/AIAIASP/PS Gr. B/2012 dated 25th
October, 2012
To, Ms Manjula Prasher,
Director General,
Department of Posts,
Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi 110 001.
Subject:Request to accommodate the surplus qualified IPs of Tamilnadu Circle working outside the Circle in the Home Circle-reg.
Respected Madam,
This is regarding re-allotment of the surplus
qualified Tamilnadu Circle IPs working in other circles. As per the scheme 45
IPs from Tamilnadu Circle were allotted to other circles. Conveniently 9 IPs
have already been re-allotted to Tamilnadu Circle whereas remaining 36 IPs are
still working in other circles, far from their families having language and
other similar placed problems. It is noteworthy to mention that the candidates
who have qualified in the subsequent year under the surplus candidates have
been allotted to the same circle in many parts of the country, but those
candidates allotted to various other circles during 2010 are denied to revert
back to their parent circle.
Even
though the scheme of surplus qualified candidates of IP examination has been
discontinued from 2011 vide Directorate letter No. A-34020/01/2007-DE dated
21/7/2011, the sufferings of surplus IPs of Tamilnadu Circle is still
continuing and affecting the most.
This
Association would like to bring to your kind notice that, at present 45 IP
posts are vacant in Tamilnadu Circle. Many a Postal Sub Divisions are vacant
and managed by additional charge. The existing IPs in Tamilnadu circle have
already been over burdened and holding the additional charge of neighbouring
Sub Divisions since years together would put them under more stress and pain.
In
view of above submissions your kind honour is requested to issue necessary
instructions to all Circles particularly Tamilnadu Circle to consider transfers
of IPs under Rule 38 to their parent circle, as circles have sufficient
vacancies to adjust IP cadre officials.
A line in reply is requested.
Yours sincerely,
(Vilas Ingale)
General Secretary
