To,
Ms.Kalpana Rajsinghot
Director (Estt. &
DE) &
Member Secretary of the Committee.
Department of Posts,
Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg,
New Delhi 110 001.
Subject:
Regarding organizational Restructuring
in Department of Posts.
Reference:
letter No. 23-1/2012-PE-II dated
10-5-2012
- The department has issued the above letter calling view of the Association regarding organizational restructuring in DOP. It is seen that main stress of the department is to help executives structure their enterprise to create accountability for results. This move of the department is appreciable and will definitely go a long way, if done, keeping in view the interest of organization as a whole and administrative side particularly.
- With the invent of technology on DOP and Consequent upon introduction of new business branches, the Department of Posts is on the verge of conversion into a dynamic organization with projects like changing ambience of the offices, providing good working environment to the staff, providing comfort to potential customers or visitors and various long lasting projects like Digitization of Records, Core Banking, Mail Optimization, Consumer Price Index, Aadhaar Technology, Biometric systems etc and to the most adhering to the norms fixed on citizen charter. All these projects are being implemented with the support and incessant hard work of IP cadre, PS Group “B” officers who are proposed to be elevated to Class-I with the proposal to upgrade Class-II Divisions to Class-I. It will not be wrong to say that the total responsibility for successful implementing the various innovative schemes has virtually devolved on the IP and ASP/Group “B”. Thus without taking into consideration career prospective of IP/ASP/Group “B” officer no organizational Restructuring will work.
- There has been no upgrading or cadre restructuring of the apex Grade of these cadres. Owing to extreme stagnancy there is resultant frustration amongst the incumbents of this cadre. Even after acquiring long years of experience and expertise they are not elevated to Group “B” what to say of Class-I. All these are not only the root cause of frustration amongst the IP cadre but these are also an impediment in effective execution of administrative policies and plan. This is bound to have an adverse impact on the efficiency of the department. Thus, cadre review along with proposed organizational Restructuring is the solution.
- An inspector of post offices feels over burdened at the beginning of his career as he has to do every type of work in his office may be of a peon in his own office, clerk & typist as it is a single man office who bears the brunt of all failings in the department as he is at the lowest rung in the administrative hierarchy. “The results – he thinks of leaving the department to join other establishment thereby brain drain. No organization can last long with the service of its frustrated employees. It is therefore necessary to strengthen the backbone of the department with a fair deal. All existing Sub Divisions should be provided office staff and post of Mail Overseer can be converted to Asstt. Inspector (PA cadre/system manager).
- At present 141 HSG-I postmaster posts are filled from ASPs, now in view of Postal Directorate letter no 4-19/2012 – SPB – II dated 02.05.2012, the provision of filling up of HSG I posts by ASPOs will not be possibly operated thereby diminishing our promotional prospects. In order to compensate IP/ASPs and to keep us in administration hierarchy separate posts of SP (Technology & BD) may be created in each proposed class-I division.
- It is one of the best ideas and will be in the betterment of things if organisational restructuring is done along with cadre review in the revised format in view of changed scenario.
- However in view of the terms of reference of Committee the views of IPASP Association are as under:
Ø
Creation of new Postal Divisions and
Regions as well as upgradation of Class II Divisions into Class I Divisions:
In
our beloved country there are 28 States and 7UTs so all the states and if
justified UTs should have independent Circle HQ, the concept of Region should
be dole out. To avoid duplicacy of
work RO may be merged with Circle by creating the post of PMG (BD &
Technology).However bigger States can have more than one independent Circle(s)
on the Telecom Circles analogy. The Class-II postal Division should be upgraded to Class-I in the following
format:
ü General
administration: The posts of ASP (HQ) and that of sub divisional
heads can be included in this category under the control of Class-I Divisions.
All the posts of ASP (HQ) and IP/ASP (Sub Divisions) should be elevated to PS
Group “B”. Examination system as in vogue presently should be dispensed with
immediately as it is creating junior/senior impediment. Only experienced
Inspector line officials should be promoted to PS Group “B” those should be
further elevated to Class-I There should be no entry of General line official
in the General administration. Their entry should only be restricted to Sr.
Postmaster Cadre only.
ü Inspection
& investigation: A separate Inspection and investigation units
should be created at Circle level. This can be compositions of Inspectors
headed by PS Group ’B’ officers under the control of DPS (IR/INV) by creating
new posts of JAG. Beside investigation/vigilance visits, the inspection work of
all the HOs /divisional offices and bad offices should be entrusted to this
unit. The other inspection work can be done by Sub Divisional officers along
with his set team. Consequently upon introduction of Core Banking Solution
(CBS) on DOP and decentralization of PLI ,there is need to have separate inspection team to inspect
and monitor the work of CBS &PLI at
Circle level. So it is suggested that two units one for CBS on the pattern of
Banks and PLI should also be established under the control of Class-I officer.
ü Business,
technological & allied works: The present incumbent
working as System Manager & MEs can be posted on the basis of some
benchmark to be fixed by department on justified posts immediately by creating
equal number of Post. They can put under the supervision of PS Group “B”
officer by creating the post of SP (Technology) in each Class-I division.
ü Sr. Postmaster Cadre: As per
Postmaster recruitment rules 2010, 25% of posts in the grade of Sr. Postmaster are
to be filled up by promotion of Postmaster Gr.III with 2 years of regular
service in the grade including regular service in HSG- I and 75% through IPs
only through LDCE. Further the Sr. Postmaster will form part in combined Group
“B” officer list after availing one opportunity of elevation through
examination so department should do away with PS Group “B” examination system
which is otherwise also giving rise to litigations. The presently working
general line PS Group “B” officer may be posted as Sr. Postmaster en-block
particularly in view of DOPT instructions to keep IP line separate from general
line. There should be no entry of General line officials to administration
& vice versa. Even the Inspector Post appeared in Sr. Postmaster exam after
rendering 6 year service as IP should have no right to come back to the
administrative line. In Class-I such promote should only be posted as Chief
Postmaster on Class-I posts.
Ø Organizational
restructuring of field formations: At present, duplicacy of work is being done in
Regional Offices. Hence, there is no need of RO.There should be only Circles.
All establishment working in ROs be shifted to Circles and utilised for
implementation/monitoring of decisions of the Department. Each revenue District
should have atleast Class-I division(s) and Tehsil/Taluka should have Class-II
Sub Division. In case any extra division i.e more than one division is justified in any particular
District as per existing norms or being framed by the committee then the
district can have two or more divisions.
Ø upgradation
of Post Offices: There should not be
any single handed SO in the DOP and as such all single handed SOs may be considered for closure and
existing manpower be utilized in other needy post offices. Status of all triple
handed SOs be upgraded as LSG/PM Grade-I converting them into a delivery Post
Offices. Simultaneously the Status of all LSG/PM Grade-I SOs be upgraded as
HSG-II/PM Grade-II and that of HSG-II/PM Grade-II HOs/SOs be upgraded as
HSG-I/PM Grade-III. There should not be any departmental Post Office with in
the distance of 2Km.
Ø Creation
of Posts of Assistants / Sorting Assistants Posts in view of the increased need
of System Administrators. With the enormous increase of work
pressure on the Postal Sub-Divisional Heads, one post each of PA and system
manager should be attached with the Sub-Division to look after computer related
work of the post offices under the control of respective sub division and other
clerical work.
In my views, there is no harm to upgrade Class-II
divisions to Class-I but simultaneously the posts of ASP (HQ), ASP (Sub
Divisions) must be upto PS Group “B”. This will definitely prove result
oriented and every cadre will provide their true commitment to various policies
and programmes of the department by ensuring its successful implementation. All
the Sub Divisions may be upgraded to Class-II level and should be provided with
adequate infrastructure and manpower as the work in the sub Divisions has been
increased manifold and without the assistance it is difficult to run the Sub
Division efficiently.
Punjab Circle IPASP Association is grateful to GS for incorporating their views in the above letter
7 comments:
Sir
Suggestions are elaborative and conducive to present scenario. It is hoped that Dte would certainly make and indepth look over it and admit our demands. Logically, when States are bearing the expenditure of each DC, SSP in every District, then why Postal Deptt should resist in maintaining one Division per Revenue District / or atleast one sub division per Tehsil/sub Tehsil.
Sir,
The idea of doing away the PS Gp B exam is not at all acceptable. The GS has not sought the views of entire circle branches in this regard. I think, it is the thought of GS or his like minded people's recommending not to conduct the PS Gp B exam. Let us all oppose this move by the GS.
ASP from Tamilnadu.
Sir,
This is regarding the questions asked in the LDCE for PS Gp B examination. The department has announced that 25 MCQs questions will be asked in "current affairs" topic. But everyone who appeared in the exam/who came to know the questions will be astonished as there were several questions not comes under the definition of current affairs but thee related to constitution of india. (eg Salary of ex officio chairman of Rajya Sabha, Age of Rajya sabha MP etc). Some questions are not at all relevant to current affairs. (eg Who is the founder of Face book, Where the Ranjit sagar dam is situated etc). If this is a situation, how could one prepare for the exam??? Instead of telling current affairs, it may be called as G.K and the aspirant candidates should be aware of this. This lapse should be taken at the dte level for taking remedial action atleast in the next exam (if held). (NB I am sending this text to every circle branches for information and n/a) ASP from TN.
Dear CS
1. Kindly update the comments
Dear Anonymous
What is the use of examination when on one side iPs /ASPs are waiting for 23-24 yrs to get Group B Promotion. It takes 12-13 yrs to become an ASP wheres is other departments like Income tax/ Central excise the inspector are promoted to
Group B in 10-12 yrs .Suppose if u do not get through any of the exam ,u have to wait for such a long period to get Group B Promotion. Then what will be ur views. Dear Anonymous PSS GP B examination is a lollipop department has given to inspectors
.U See the discrimination. Inspector Post first has to compete for 2-3 vacancies in the circle whereas in case Sr postmaster coming from postmaster grade is to be promoted of seniority cum fitness and yet again the IP/ASP has appear for another litmus test of Group B exam where clear favoritism has remained prevalent in past , present and future also. Is it possible to get 100/100 marks in papers. In present change in pattern of Gp B Exam , the 200 words paragraph /essay writing will source of problem which failure candidates have faced. Our GS has rightly recommended to do away the examination and I strongly appose ur view
Dear CS
1. Our case for grade pay of 4600/- was fought in the Ernakulam bench of CAT and was decided in the favor of IPs . Shri Parmanand who has single handedly pursued this case with the help of learned counsel. Today 08 months have been passed but no further action has been taken by Shri Permanand to get the decision executed or to file contempt in the CAT . I suggest Shri Parmanand ji to either file contempt in the court himself or he has no time for this greater cause, then he should authorize the association or CS Kerala circle to discuss the issue with the learned counsel to file contempt immediately as the time is passing very fast. Our central leadership Shri Vilas Ingle, Suresh ji , Harimohan and CS Delhi circle should request Shri Permanand in this regard.
Dear Anonmyous,
Before promulgating the idea of doing away the PS Gp B examination, will the GS ensure that all the IP be promoted to PS Gp B Cadre within the span of 10-12 years???? A big "CANNOT' will be the answer. Hence examination for PS Gp B is the only solution for those who are much talented as it is not correct to drag those IPs who are talented to make them equated with all other not much talented(i.e promoting the IPs with ref to their seniority and no weightage is given for his talent). ASP from Tamilnadu
Post a Comment