OFFICE BEARERS

Circle President : - Sukhtej Singh, Assistant Supdt Posts, Amritsar Sub Division, Amritsar 9463004921;

Circle Secretary :- Vikas Sharma, Assistant Supdt Posts, Ropar Sub Division, Ropar 9417226661;

Circle Treasurer :- Gaurav Nagi, Inspector Post (PMU) Punjab Circle Chandigarh (M) 09876581559


Sunday, May 27, 2012

REQUEST TO GS TO TAKE UP ISSUE WITH DIRECTORATE

Dear GS
It is to inform you that authority of Punjab postal Circle has not allowed some of our members to fill the OMR sheet on the ground that training period spent before induction in IP cadre is not to be reckoned as qualifying service. The second reason being adverse entry like ‘warning’, ‘reprimand’ emerged in last 5 years’ ACR/APAR, though otherwise their grading in APAR remains between 6-8(very good).
Since both the reasons of the department are unfounded and against the rules in vogue so this request. In view of such acts, few members of this Association have knocked the doors of Courts for relief and as such got relief. Hon’ble CAT Ernakulam Bench OA No. 380/2012 and 232/2012 filed at Bangalore CAT bench may kindly be referred to. Since our members were not part to any OA filed by other members and get relief so they approached Directorate through different representations to allow them to appear in the examination. Their representations are still pending for decision and as such, the circles will not be in a position to allow them to fill OMR sheets. Not allowing all eligible even those who have not approached the court will be against the natural justice and infringement to article 14 & 16 of the Constitution. It will also be a discrimination to other eligible similar situated candidates who are not party to the OA.
In view of above it is requested to take up case with directorate immediately with the request to either allow all similar situated IP/ASP by issuing roll number well before examination or the examination may be postponed to afford opportunity.
It is to inform you that I have already mailed my comments on organizational restructuring in DOP, the same may kindly be accepted. 

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

this matter require priority hence should be taken up immediately to avoid any discrimination among the members applicant.

VIKAS SHARMA ASRM JALANDHAR said...

Dear Hari,

Thanks for the same. Please remain in touch with G.S and with Directorate for the same as I am one of the effected person in said examination.

Anonymous said...

Dear Sir,

Our GS iws weakening our stand. one side he has given letter tpo directorate to withdraw the Gr. B. exam notification and the other side he hiself is highlighting that the exam will be conducted at due date and time ? What does it mean ? Whether he is infuenced with some of the Directorate officers. If is a fact that many of the eligible candidates have not even permitted so far. In place of fighting for its members, our GS is behaving differently. Very difficult to understand.
Thanks.

Anonymous said...

Dear Sir,
Whether the calculated vacancy was correct?
We expect 19 for IP line and 2 for general line .
You remained silent on this issue.
Please make your stand in this regard.
with regards.